Transfictionnalités cinématographiques de Frankenstein : éléments pour une théorie du Frankenfilm

Authors

Keywords:

Frankenstein, Intermediality, Transmediality, Metalepsis, Transfiction

Abstract

The cultural omnipresence and the plasticity of the Frankenstein figure confirm its status as “transfuge fiction” identified by Richard Saint-Gelais and requires an adequate methodology. This article applies it mainly to the filmic corpus—the Frankenfilms—considered as a set of variants of the myths rather than adaptations of an original, authoritative, narrative. It combines transmedial and intermedial approaches and utilises the concept of metalepsis. The latter enables us to see in what way the Frankenfilms achieve a reversal of the creator / creature relationship that relies on a number of constants, among which the breaking of the “fourth wall”.

Author Biography

Jean-François Baillon, Univ. Bordeaux Montaigne

Jean-François Baillon teaches English Studies and Film Studies at Bordeaux Montaigne University. Honorary President of SERCIA (Société d’Études et de Recherches sur le Cinéma Anglophone), he has published articles on British cinema, British actors and actresses, gothic and horror films, and heritage cinema in collective books and in journals such as Mise au Point, Éclipses, Film Journal, CinémAction and Positif. Recent publications: J.F. Baillon, ed., E. M. Forster’s Howards End (1910) and James Ivory’s Howards End (1992), Paris, Ellipses, 2019.

Published

2020-01-31

How to Cite

Baillon, J.-F. (2020). Transfictionnalités cinématographiques de Frankenstein : éléments pour une théorie du Frankenfilm. Leaves, (9). Retrieved from https://revues.u-bordeaux-montaigne.fr/leaves/article/view/338

Issue

Section

II. Metafictional Frankensteins