Immediacy versus Hypermediacy, Straight versus Un-straight: Staged Photography as Remediation

Authors

Keywords:

Staged photography, Straight photography, Remediation, Immediacy, Hypermediacy

Abstract

Bolter and Grusin understand the process of remediation as based on the two contradictory imperatives for immediacy and hypermediacy. The desire for immediacy is a desire for a transparent medium and a desire to deny the mediated character of technologies and media. The fascination with hypermediacy, in contrast, concerns a specific representational practice and a visual style that foregrounds the mediated character of media. In this paper I will rethink the desire for immediacy and the fascination for hypermediacy. I will argue that the medium of photography as such is not at all the embodiment of the desire of immediacy. Important photographic practices in the history of the photographic medium emphasize its hypermediacy in order to demonstrate the intentionality of the photographer.

Author Biography

Ernst van Alphen, Leiden University

Ernst van Alphen is Professor of Literary Studies at Leiden University. Recent book publications are Art in Mind: How Contemporary Images Shape Thought (University of Chicago Press, 2005), Staging the Archive: Art and Photography in Times of New Media (Reaktion Books, 2016), Failed Images: Photography and its Counter-Practices (Valiz, 2018)

Downloads

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

van Alphen, E. (2019). Immediacy versus Hypermediacy, Straight versus Un-straight: Staged Photography as Remediation. Leaves, (7). Retrieved from https://revues.u-bordeaux-montaigne.fr/leaves/article/view/313

Issue

Section

Collection of articles